ok, i know this has been discussed 2 billions times. but, i've got to say what i've got to say:
1. in my opinion, there's NOTHING pornographic/ indecent about the content of accused newspaper.
2. EVEN IF, they're priniting hardcore porn or whatsoever, supposedly all university students are over 18 so i don't see any problem with that.
3. the responses of censorship department / high ranking officials of chinese university / mass media smear campaign are predictably ridiculous; however, i m so so so dissapointed to see the response of so many bloggers/ ordinary ppl which revealed that they are:
i. incredibly lacking sexual knowledge/ ignorant
ii. refuse to give any space to alternative ideas/ narrow-mindness
iii. unbelivably aggressive & full of hatred
all that add together:
u talk bout animal sex= u are sick = we have to burn u alive & drink your ashes
hong kong people are such cowards, that we dun have the courage to face our own sex, our own body & desire (oh please, u're not bounce out of a piece of rock are u). sex must be something ' indecent' & hidden & the dark. if someone dare to start talking everyone have to silence him at once & skin him alive. while at the same time all the magazines are full of barely-claded pornstar like photo. the society is just pathetic.
i strongly support chinese university student newspaper--
* * * * *
please read michel foucault: history of sexuality
i really feel like hong kong is stuck in a dinosours age---while the rest of the world has moved on, the mentality of sexuality in hong kong is at least 80 years behind. or are we going backwards?????
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


No comments:
Post a Comment