ok, i know this has been discussed 2 billions times. but, i've got to say what i've got to say:
1. in my opinion, there's NOTHING pornographic/ indecent about the content of accused newspaper.
2. EVEN IF, they're priniting hardcore porn or whatsoever, supposedly all university students are over 18 so i don't see any problem with that.
3. the responses of censorship department / high ranking officials of chinese university / mass media smear campaign are predictably ridiculous; however, i m so so so dissapointed to see the response of so many bloggers/ ordinary ppl which revealed that they are:
i. incredibly lacking sexual knowledge/ ignorant
ii. refuse to give any space to alternative ideas/ narrow-mindness
iii. unbelivably aggressive & full of hatred
all that add together:
u talk bout animal sex= u are sick = we have to burn u alive & drink your ashes
hong kong people are such cowards, that we dun have the courage to face our own sex, our own body & desire (oh please, u're not bounce out of a piece of rock are u). sex must be something ' indecent' & hidden & the dark. if someone dare to start talking everyone have to silence him at once & skin him alive. while at the same time all the magazines are full of barely-claded pornstar like photo. the society is just pathetic.
i strongly support chinese university student newspaper--
* * * * *
please read michel foucault: history of sexuality
i really feel like hong kong is stuck in a dinosours age---while the rest of the world has moved on, the mentality of sexuality in hong kong is at least 80 years behind. or are we going backwards?????
Monday, May 14, 2007
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)

